为您找到"
( )1. i n k ( )2...
"相关结果约100,000,000个
Let 2k be the greatest power of two such that 2k ≤ n. Considern - 2k. Since 2k ≥ 1 for any natural number k, we know that n - 2k < n. Since 2k ≤ n, we know 0 ≤ n - 2k. Thus, by our inductive hypothesis, n - 2k is the sum of distinct powers of two. If S be the set of these powers of two, then n is the sum of these powers of two ...
Inductive hypothesis: Assume that the formula for the series is true for some arbitrary term, n. Inductive step: Using the inductive hypothesis, prove that the formula for the series is true for the next term, n+1. Conclusion: Since the base case and the inductive step are both true, it follows that the formula for the series is true for all terms.
Step 1. Show it is true for first case, usually n=1; Step 2. Show that if n=k is true then n=k+1 is also true; How to Do it. Step 1 is usually easy, we just have to prove it is true for n=1. Step 2 is best done this way: Assume it is true for n=k; Prove it is true for n=k+1 (we can use the n=k case as a fact.)
Thus, by induction we have \(1 + 2 + ... + n = \displaystyle\frac{n(n + 1)}{2}, \, \forall n \in \mathbb{Z}\). We will explore examples that are related to number patterns in the next section. This page titled 3.1: Proof by Induction is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Pamini Thangarajah .
We can use the summation notation (also called the sigma notation) to abbreviate a sum.For example, the sum in the last example can be written as \[\sum_{i=1}^n i.\] The letter \(i\) is the index of summation.By putting \(i=1\) under \(\sum\) and \(n\) above, we declare that the sum starts with \(i=1\), and ranges through \(i=2\), \(i=3\), and so on, until \(i=n\).
= 3n + 3(k 2 + k + 1) = 3(n + k 2 + k + 1) As it is a multiple of 3 we can say that it is divisible by 3. Thus, P(k+1) is true i.e. (k + 1) 3 + 2(k + 1) is be divisible by 3. Now by the Principle of Mathematical Induction, we can say that, P(n): n 3 + 2n is divisible by 3 is true. Read More, Arithmetic Progression; Geometric Progression
I will refer to the statement 1+2+ +n = n(n+1) 2 as p(n) here. We speci cally proved the following things: 1 2S, i.e., p(1) is true. ... Xn k=1 k(k + 1) = 1(2) = 2 = 1(2)(3) 3, so the result holds. Inductive Hypothesis: Suppose, for some n 2N, we have Xn k=1 k(k + 1) = n(n+ 1)(n+ 2)
You want to assume $\sum^n_{k=1} k2^k =(n-1)(2^n+1)+2$, then prove $\sum^{n+1}_{k=1} k2^k =(n)(2^{n+1}+1)+2$ The place to start is $$\sum^{n+1}_{k=1} k2^k =\sum^n_{k=1} k2^k+(n+1)2^{n+1}\\=(n-1)(2^n+1)+2+(n+1)2^{n+1}$$ Where the first just shows the extra term broken out and the second uses the induction assumption.
Note this common technique: In the "n = k + 1" step, it is usually a good first step to write out the whole formula in terms of k + 1, and then break off the "n = k", so you can replace it with whatever assumption you made about n = k in the assumption step.Then you manipulate and simplify, and try to rearrange things to get the RHS of the formula to match what you got for the LHS.
Andreas von Ettingshausen introduced the notation () in 1826, [1] although the numbers were known centuries earlier (see Pascal's triangle).In about 1150, the Indian mathematician Bhaskaracharya gave an exposition of binomial coefficients in his book Līlāvatī. [2]Alternative notations include C(n, k), n C k, n C k, C k n, [3] C n k, and C n,k, in all of which the C stands for combinations ...